Parties without a healer lose more, or do they only play harder fights?

Comparing win rates of parties with and without a role gives a big gap that is mostly something else: bigger groups bring more roles and win more. This entry shows how to compare like with like, so you know what a missing role really costs.

Why this works

Groups that differ in one way usually differ in others, and bigger groups both win more and hold more roles. Comparing only groups of the same size removes that mix-up, so what is left is closer to the price of the missing role.

When not to use it

Skip it in a game for solo players, or when you have too few group runs to fill each size. Then the cells are too thin to mean anything. Run a controlled test with testers, or simply ask them.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 38 lines of example code with 4 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Parties without a healer lose more, or do they only play harder fights?" (read_entry rpg-missing-role-effect-on-party-wins) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP