Is the "decider" role in a rotating story really shared fairly?

When the right to decide moves around the group, equal numbers of turns are not fair if people were not all there for every decision. This entry shows how to work out how many turns each person should have had, and how far from that they ended up.

Why this works

Fair does not mean equal counts. It means each person gets turns in proportion to the decisions they were there for. Adding up each person's chance at every decision gives the number of turns that should have been theirs.

When not to use it

Skip it when the role is meant to go to the best-suited person, such as the one who knows the map, or when the group is happy with a leader. Then equal turns would be the unfair choice; ask the group.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 28 lines of example code with 3 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Is the "decider" role in a rotating story really shared fairly?" (read_entry fair-turns-for-the-story-decider) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP