Separate players who stop at a chapter's end from players who really gave up

Not everyone who closes a story game was driven away. Many simply finish a chapter and go to bed. Counting them as lost makes every chapter end look like a disaster. This entry shows how to split the two kinds of stopping so you only worry about the real losses.

Why this works

Stopping at the end of a chapter is a decision to rest, while leaving in the middle is a loss. Placing each quit inside its chapter separates the two, so the work goes where players were pulled out.

When not to use it

Wrong for very short chapters, games without chapters, or endings that cliffhang on purpose to bring people back: an end quit can be a problem there. Check who actually returns to play the next part.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 32 lines of example code with 3 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Separate players who stop at a chapter's end from players who really gave up" (read_entry vn-natural-stopping-points) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP