Do players finish the campaign tasks in the order the story expects?

When tasks can be done in any order, the story told around them can contradict itself. This entry shows how to measure how often players go out of order, how to treat tasks they skipped, and what share should make you rewrite the text.

Why this works

What matters is which tasks came before which, not where each one landed in the list. Looking at pairs means one skipped task does not spoil the rest, so the result says how far players really drift from the order your story assumes.

When not to use it

It is pointless when the story is meant to be told in any order, or when the game forces one route. Then a high share is no finding. Instead check that each text still makes sense when read first or last.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 21 lines of example code with 4 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Do players finish the campaign tasks in the order the story expects?" (read_entry strat-quest-order-inversions) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP