Do testers read faster and faster as the story goes on?

A story that loses a reader does not announce it. This entry turns the speed at which text is clicked through into one clear signal for a whole session: slowing down, steady, or hurrying, and shows how one long break can fake a trend.

Why this works

Reading speed follows interest and effort. If it climbs through a session, people are skimming because they care less. If it falls, the text is harder or they are tired. A trend over the whole session beats any single scene.

When not to use it

A rise at the end can be wanted, when people already know the ending, and different scenes simply have different text. Don't read a trend where the first and last scenes differ in kind. Compare similar scenes only.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 21 lines of example code with 5 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Do testers read faster and faster as the story goes on?" (read_entry reading-speed-drift-in-a-session) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP