Merge three gems into one of the next level, again and again, without losing any

Merging many small pickups into fewer bigger ones is a satisfying chore, and a good way to keep the bag small. It goes wrong at the edges: leftover pieces that vanish, merges that only go one level, or a top tier that tries to merge into nothing. This entry does it in one pass.

Why this works

Merging is a conversion with no loss, so the total worth must be the same before and after. Moving up the tiers once, from the bottom, lets newly made gems join the next merge at once, and leftovers stay visible rather than vanishing.

When not to use it

Don't merge on your own when the choice is part of the fun, for instance when players keep different tiers for different tasks, or when merging costs gold or time. Ask the player first, or merge only what they select.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 4 common mistakes and the fix
• 24 lines of example code with 4 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "Merge three gems into one of the next level, again and again, without losing any" (read_entry three-gems-merge-into-one-of-the-next-tier) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP