12 of 40 testers quit at the bridge: is that a real problem or just chance?

With a small group of players, a percentage jumps around a lot, and two levels with different numbers may be equally hard. This entry gives your AI an honest range for the number, and a rule for when two numbers really differ.

Why this works

A small group gives a rough picture, and the fewer people there are, the wider the range the true number could lie in. Stating that range keeps you from reading a difference into what may be pure chance.

When not to use it

Skip it when the testers are not typical players, such as friends who are kind to you, or when a problem is obvious from watching them play. Then fix what you saw, and save the numbers for a larger, more varied group.

In the full entry

• What to build, step by step
• Starting values and the reason for each
• 3 common mistakes and the fix
• 20 lines of example code with 4 checks that pass
• How your AI shows you that it works

Say this to your AI

Use the Spielerando entry "12 of 40 testers quit at the bridge: is that a real problem or just chance?" (read_entry is-this-quit-rate-real-with-few-players) in my game. Build it step by step, and show me how you checked that it works.

Or skip this and connect the MCP: your AI then finds all of this by itself.Connect the MCP